🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart nuclear talks with the United States on condition that it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations produced results, and disclosed fresh requests had come from go-betweens to resume discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Course

Araghchi is walking a complex course since Iran wishes not to be seen to be operating from a situation of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger defensively and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that culminated with Donald Trump declaring the sites had been obliterated. Subsequently, Western states exercised their authority to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted three times they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be revived in various formats if negotiations resume.

The American leader last week claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from Washington either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of inactivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Position

In his remarks to the conference, intended to portray the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the idea of international law, Araghchi said the two-week conflict demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by military means. He stated the strikes commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and cooperation, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Negotiations Continues the Final Resolution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently sought to dictate their demands during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the final resolution to resolve disputes, but its criteria, rules and tenets must be respected."

"If they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and respect, they will get a response in the identical approach."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The Iranian people have become stronger, more united, and more endorsing of the government and the country in the aftermath of this invasion."